From LdyTeresa@aol.com Tue Jan 30 03:45:34 1996
Received: from mtd.com (mtd.com [199.34.33.66]) by ss2.digex.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id DAA18656 for <mike@ss2.digex.net>; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 03:45:33 -0500
Received: from emout08.mail.aol.com ([198.81.11.23]) by mtd.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with ESMTP id DAA02060 for <eats@peta.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 03:45:24 -0500
Received: by emout08.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id DAA09450 for eats@peta.org; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 03:44:02 -0500
Message-ID: <960130034359_307164802@emout08.mail.aol.com>
From: LdyTeresa@aol.com
To: eats@peta.org
Subject: Comments
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 03:44:02 -0500

     I know I am probably playing into your sick little game by responding,
but I felt compelled to anyways.  What I don't understand is....what are you
trying to prove?  Surely you must realize what enemies this page would bring.
 What I find most amusing is your willingness to "show-off" your hate mail.
 I wonder why you aren't as willing to share the identities of those who
supposedly "support" your page.  My theory is that they are either a:
contrived comments, or b:  brief quotes taken from one or two letters.  I
would like to say that even though I support animal rights I do not "hate"
people.  I have respect for all sencient beings.  Therefore I will call you
an asshole but will not threaten or suggest you should be harmed.  As for the
lack of responces that one "advocate" noted, I can only suggest that most
animal supporters are probably out trying to make things better for animals
or something equally as noble, as opposed to directing their time and money
to the sole purpose of annoying others.

Teresa M.

PS.  I await your responce.